You Tube clip of Botany by-election debate 15 February 2011.

16 February 2011

Forwarded FYI.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=78LINO0-bXE

Each of the following five candidates in the Botany by-election had 4 minutes to explain who they are are why people should vote for them.

Alphabetically:

Penny Bright
Lyn Murphy
Jami-Lee Ross
Michael Wood
Paul Young

Filmed and forwarded by

Vincenteastwood <guerillamrnews@gmail.com>

Penny Bright

Media Spokesperson
Water Pressure Group
Judicially recognised Public Watchdog on Metrowater, water and Auckland regional governance matters.
“Anti-corruption campaigner”.

Attendee: Australian Public Sector Anti-Corruption Conference 2009
Attendee: Transparency International’s 14th Anti-Corruption Conference 2010
Auckland Mayoral Candidate 2010.

Independent Candidate Botany by-election 2011.

https://waterpressure.wordpress.com

Ph (09) 846 9825
021 211 4 127

YouTube – Videos from this email

Reply

Reply

“Botany candidates keep it clean” Posted on 15 February 2011 by BELINDA MCCAMMON

http://kiwi247.com/news/botany-candidates-keep-it-clean

National News, News

Botany candidates keep it clean

Posted on 15 February 2011 by BELINDA MCCAMMON

Botany’s first by-election debate provided few fireworks this evening but plenty of opportunity for party candidates to try out well-worn campaign lines.

Full Story at BELINDA MCCAMMON

Botany’s first by-election debate provided few fireworks this evening but plenty of opportunity for party candidates to try out well-worn campaign lines.

Five of the ten Botany by-election candidates were asked to take part in the candidates meeting, with organisers saying having all candidates there would have been too difficult to manage and the other five candidates represented fringe parties.

National candidate Jami-Lee Ross, Labour candidate Michael Wood, New Citizen Party candidate Paul Young, Act candidate Lyn Murphy and Independent candidate Penny Bright gave a brief speech before answering questions from the crowd of about 80.

About 20 of those were Labour Party supporters, sitting in a block, the rest were made up of supporters from the other candidates with a probably only a minority of undecided voters at the debate.

The candidates were asked a range of questions from the audience, covering all the main themes, including the environment, law and order, access to the country’s beaches and affordable housing.

But there were Botany-specific questions as well, with candidates asked how they would represent the interests of the 49 percent of Botany residents who were born overseas, one of the highest rates for any New Zealand electorate.

Jami-Lee Ross proved to be a safe-pair of hands for National, sticking to message and sounding knowledgeable and confident well beyond his years.

Labour’s Michael Wood, Ross’ main challenger, did his best to target Ross but at times came unstuck.

Wood drew a shout of “hypocrite Labour” from the floor when he said he did not support privatisation with Ross wasting no time capitalising on it, saying the National Government had learnt from the mistakes of ministers like Phil Goff.
Wood said he would champion more community services and especially targeted the need for parents to have their early childcare funding restored.

Ross was asked if he was a person who could keep his promises given he said he would serve three years as an Auckland councillor but has said he would resign if elected as an MP less than a year into his term.

Ross said he was committed to Botany and could not have foreseen Pansy Wong would resign when he stood for council.

Candidates kept the debate clean, with no-one getting too personal, though Ross clearly couldn’t resist referring to Wood as his “fellow candidate from Mt Roskill”.

Wood doesn’t live in the electorate and is a local ward member in the Mt Roskill electorate

Penny Bright, a well-known local body activist, provided rare moments of light relief.

She said the by-election was a good time to send a message to the Government.

“First Egypt, then Botany – it’s people power time.”

Bright also managed to raise the most laughs when answering a question on asset sales, saying she was against them.

“Partial privatisation is like partial pregnancy, there is no such thing.”

Heckling was kept to a minimum and when the audience did seem to be getting too vocal, the facilitator Lloyd Wong asked people to respect the church the debate was taking place in and it’s spirituality.

The by-election is on March 5.

Public Watchdog and Kiwiblogger agree that 34 new BMWs for Ministers is ‘an incredibly stupid blunder’.

www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2011/02/a_stupid_blunder.html#comment-799346

A stupid blunder

Tom Hunt at Stuff reports:

The Government has splashed out on 34 new top-of-the-line BMWs that sell for more than $200,000 each.

The Green Party has called the ordering of the cars a disgrace.

But the Internal Affairs Department says it has been three years since the Government bought its last fleet, which will be sold when the new cars start to arrive later this year. …

A spokesman for Prime Minister John Key said this was the same process that had happened for years. “It is standard for a progressive upgrade of the VIP fleet to happen every three years or when the vehicle reaches 90,000 kilometres.”

What’s standard is how unpopular this is. I give the Government a big fail for this move. When Labour did the same in 2008 I put it down to advanced third termitis (when you no longer sense what may be unpopular), but this is even worse as National is in their first term.

It does not matter what the contract said about upgrades, or what level of discount the Government gets upgrading in year three – the only thing the public will remember is a Government saying times are tight having money to buy new BMWs for Ministers. An incredibly stupid blunder.

Someone should have intervened and ensured that any fleet replacement does not take place in election year. Unless one actually wants to lose votes.

No TweetBacks yet. (Be the first to Tweet this post)

Tags: government spending, National
This entry was posted on Wednesday, February 16th, 2011 at 7:40 am and is filed under NZ Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

1. publicwatchdog (34) Says:
   February 16th, 2011 at 8:07 am 

   “What’s standard is how unpopular this is. I give the Government a big fail for this move. When Labour did the same in 2008 I put it down to advanced third termitis (when you no longer sense what may be unpopular), but this is even worse as National is in their first term.

   It does not matter what the contract said about upgrades, or what level of discount the Government gets upgrading in year three – the only thing the public will remember is a Government saying times are tight having money to buy new BMWs for Ministers. An incredibly stupid blunder.”

   Totally agree.

   If you want to jam the public’s ‘apoplectic’ button on full – MP’s flash cars, salary increases and overseas trips is the way to do it.

   Sorry John Key – but your phony, spin-doctored, packaged ‘ordinary bloke’ mask is slipping…………………..

   Your ‘true blue’ corporate arrogance is coming through – loud and clear.

   The decision to buy new BMWs for Ministers has happened on YOUR watch, and you will personally benefit from this decision.

   A truly marvellous ‘lead from the front’ – NOT.

   ‘An incredibly stupid blunder’.

   Indeed.

   ‘Shonky’ John Key strikes again?

   Penny Bright
   Future MP for Botany?

   https://waterpressure.wordpress.com