The Watchdog

Keeping citizens in the loop

URGENT! ‘$WINES INVENTED FLU’ Whistleblower Jane Burgermeister is under attack! She needs our support! Please pass this on!

1 July 2010

Hi folks!

Jane Burgermeister is under attack!
She needs our support.

www.theflucase.com

“An Austrian judge who has been caught out in wrong doing applied yesterday for Jane Burgermeister to be placed under the guardianship of a court in a move that would result in Burgermeister being deprived of all her basic freedoms and rights, including the right to property and the right to represent herself in court.
…………………………………..

Once placed under court supervision, Jane Burgemeister will not be able to continue her work uncovering scandals as a journalist because a guardian has extensive power determine what a person can and cannot do.

Jane Burgermeister has written for Nature, The Scientist, the British Medical Journal as well as the Guardian, the Observer, American Prospect and European Voice.

Her claims that the swine flu pandemic was hyped for profit have been reinforced by a report just issued by the Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________
24 Jun 2010
www.legitgov.org
All links are here:
www.legitgov.org/#breaking_news

Swine flu risk ‘was vastly over-rated’ by World Health Organisation 25 Jun 2010 Threats of a swine flu pandemic were ‘vastly over-rated’ by the World Health Organisation, an inquiry has concluded. The Council of Europe last night also accused the UN’s health arm of ‘grave shortcomings’ in the process that led it to declare a pandemic last year. Plummeting confidence in health advice could prove ‘disastrous’ in the event of a severe future pandemic, parliamentarians at the Strasbourg-based senate said.

Council of Europe calls for WHO flu handling probe 24 Jun 2010 The Council of Europe called Thursday for a probe into the World Health Organisation’s handling of the H1N1 swine flu outbreak, which it said led to unjustified scares and waste of public money. A council parliamentary assembly identified “grave shortcomings” about WHO transparency about its position on the flu, “generating concerns about the influence of the pharmaceutical industry on decisions taken,” a statement said. The session adopted a text that says there was “overwhelming evidence that the seriousness of the pandemic was vastly overrated by WHO”. Paul Flynn, British author of a report endorsed by the assembly, told the session that the WHO’s June 11, 2009 declaration of a H1N1 pandemic had enabled the pharmaceutical industry to reap large profits

______________________________________________________________________________________________

She, therefore, has a proven track record of accurate reporting.

There can be no question, therefore, of Jane Burgermeister being too confused to run her own life and represent herself in court.

The move to appointment a guardian is an unscrupulous bid to silence a journalist and a whistle blower.

This blatant abuse of office by a judge will fuel concerns that Austria has become a third world, banana Republic where there is no more rule of law left.

Government officials plunder citizens of their assets with impunity and then place them under court supervision whenever their victims start to take legal action in order for them to be able to continue their plunder.

A judge caught out in manipulating files to get more control of an estate can simply order the person who found the evidence to be placed in court guardianship, and deprived of all rights and all power to take any legal action.

It will take several days for the court in Döbling to do the paperwork following Lauer’s request. Jane Burgermeister will present the Döbling officials, among others, with documents, facts and records that strongly suggest that the appointment of a guardian for her is being blatantly and outragrously misused by Lauer to cover up evidence of a fraud.

If a judge is allowed to abuse their power so flagrantly in Austria and to force people to accept court supervision to stamp out evidence of their own crimes, no one in Austria is safe.

No one who goes into a hospital in old age is safe. And no one who makes a complaint about corrupt officials can be sure they will not be deprived of their property and basic rights by those same corrupt officials. ………………..”

If you can afford to send Jane a donation to help her – that would be GREAT!

http://www.theflucase.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=3719%3Ajane-burgermeister-needs-our-help&catid=3%3Anewsflash&lang=en

Please pass this message on.

Cheers!

Penny
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

1 July 2010

Hi Jane!

You must be rattling some BIG cages!

We need an INTERNATIONAL SIGN ON LETTER to help you.

Who do you think is the most appropriate person to address it to?

(For the MAXIMUM fuss?)

Do you have the email addresses of the following:

Austrian Minister of Courts? Minister of Justice? PM?

and ALL Austrian MPs?

What would also be VERY helpful are the email addresses of ALL the EU MPs.

We need a brief outline of what this Judge is threatening to do to do.

ON WHAT LAWFUL BASIS?

In NZ – under the ‘Privacy Act’ we can ask for ALL information held about us by any body.

Is that the same in Austria?

Can you do a ‘Privacy Act’ request to the Minister of Courts (whoever) and see what you flush out?

Also an urgent complaint to the EU Human Rights Cttee (or whatever it’s called)?

How about contacting those EU MPs who have been involved in the WHO / $WINE FLU investigation (if you haven’t already’?

This is SO outrageous – it will actually help us!

Penny

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

1 July 2010

EMAIL FROM JANE BURGERMEISTER:

“You have heard about many shocking stories of abuse by government officials.

Get this one.

After I found hard evidence that a judge was crooked, that same judge moved to put me under court supervision!

This just happened today!

I will be taking legally action! I will be filing criminal charges as soon as I can, probably tomorrow or Friday.

I will put the documents up on the internet so people can see it is not a fairytale.

I posted this report up on my website.

I fear my case is not alone. There are many others in Austria and elsewhere in Europe.

“An Austrian judge who has been caught out in wrong doing applied yesterday for Jane Burgermeister to be placed under the guardianship of a court in a move that would result in Burgermeister being deprived of all her basic freedoms and rights, including the right to property and the right to represent herself in court.

The judge’s move came today after Jane Burgermeister was given permission see the files in the court of Hietzing, Vienna, concerning the administration of the estate of her late father – and yesterday documented evidence of of the manipulation of files, recording that many documents, faxes and emails suggesting wrongdoing, fraud and false statements were missing.

Burgermeister subsequently sent a fax of some twenty pages listing the specific documents missing, and also including copies, and asked for these documents to be included in the court file.

This was a move that clearly so worried Magister Michaela Lauer that she immediately wrote a letter to the court near to where Jane Burgermeister lives, in Vienna Döbling, asking for the officials there to begin the process to place her under court guardianship.

This would strip Burgemreister of her basic rights, including the right to run her blog if her guardian refuses to allow it.

Jane Burgermeister only found out about this extraordinary move when she returned to the court early this morning, Wednesday, having collected yet more evidence of missing documents.

Among those documents that she brought with her and asked to be included in the files were faxes and documents that showed that Dr Stephan Pflugbeil, a doctor at Lainz hospital, had applied for the guardianship of her aunt immediately after she had asked to see the files following evidence of wrong doing.

Pflugbeil had planned to send Burgermeister’s elderly aunt to a private old people’s Schloss Liechenstein Kralik outside of Vienna and with exorbitant costs – but without informing either, and, also, in spite of a prior written agreement in which her aunt had singled out those old people’s homes she wished.

The costs of the home were to be deducted from her aunt’s estate.

Instead of allowing Jane Burgermeister to see the files, Dr Pflugbeil applied for the court guardianship of her aunt at top speed – and the judge he applied to was Mag Michaela Lauer in the court of Hietzung, the very same judge who has now applied for Jane Burgermeister to be placed under court supervision and stripped of her most basic rights, including her right to ask for redress in a court.

It was only because Lauer had not completed the paperwork for a guardian to be appointed for her aunt that Jane Burgermeister was able, with the help of written and oral permission from her aunt and with the help of the Ombudsman at the hospital, to access her aunt’s hospital records.

She looked in files that were supposed to be “complete” only to find her fax listing evidence of wrongdoing in relation to Schloss Liechtenstein Kralik was missing altogether. That meant that there was no causal link visible between her fax presenting evidence that her aunt was being defrauded and the application for a guardian to be appointed to administer all her aunt’s estate by the very same person.

Dr Pflugbeil even told Burgermeister to her face he had only applied for the court guardian to protect himself from legal action.

Jane Burgermeister also found evidnce of the systematic manipulation of documents in her late father’s files when she finally accessed them yesterday, Tuesday. Faxes, emails and official court documents pertinent to the case were removed.

Among the documents showing evidence of wronging doing is a letter from Lloyds TSB bank stating that they had received no letter from the solicitor Lauer had appointed, namely, Dr Eric Posvek and Magister Friedrich Hutz, requesting the transfer of funds amounting to 60,000 UKP from a Lloyds account of her father to Austria.

The solicitor Hutz had told Burgermeister on the phone that he had written three times requesting the transfer of money. A copy of the letter he sent shows that it has the account number.

In a telephone call with Lloyds staff, it emerged that Lloyds can trace any letter by the bank account alone, strongly suggesting no letter was sent.

Other emails missing included evidence she had reactivated the insurance for a house after it was wrongly cancelled.

The judge Lauer gave as totally spurious reasons for applying for a court guardian for Jane Burgermeister, a document that Lauer obviously never reckoned with Jane Burgermeister ever getting to see.

Having seen her off the day before, Lauer clearly thought the coast was clear.

Lauer says in her request for Jane Burgermeister to be put under court supervision that she is in danger of doing financial damage to her estate.

This in spite of hard evidence that Burgermeister had to take the intititive to activate on March 12th a house insurance policy that had been wrongly cancelled, leaving a a house uninsured for four months and without the solicitor Hutz doing anything about it or informing the affected parties adequately in emails or by phone.

In addition, Burgermeister was the one who made a successful contact with Lloyds TSB bank and obtained the grant probate papers neeeded to effect a transfer of funds in compliance with a court order.

Far from causing damage to the estate, therefore, Burgermeister has a proven track record in protecting it from the significant damage due to the negligence, at best, of the solicitor.

In addition, Lauer falsely claims that Burgermeister had applied for „always new evaluations of the many properties, inspite of there being a court evalaution,” implying she is unreasonable.

But as emails and other documents show, there are only two properties and Burgermeister only applied for a second evaluation of those both properties after an application was made for a second evaluation of one by another party.

In an email, she explicitly says she does not want any second evaluation, but if one property is going to be evaluated anyway, then the other should be at the same time to ensure objectivity.

She had to repeat this application over and over again because, as emails show, the solicitor, Hutz, ignored it.

Months went by not with Burgermeister asking for ever new evaluations as Lauer claims, but with Burgermeister having to restate the same request.

Burgermeister finally found out ten days ago that no evaluation of the two properties was planned by Hutz contrary to his previous statements, and she asked for a competent solicitor to be appointed.

Instead of doing just that and appointing a solicitor who does his job or carrying out a second evaluation of two properties as would be the correct legal path, the judge Lauer handed the estate over to a court official who can order a fire sale of all assets.

I wonder who will benefit from that? Let’s guess.

Even though Jane Burgermeister and her brothers do not always see eye to eye, the adminsitration of the estate of her late mother, Joan McGoldrick, including a house, in England in 2004/5 went smoothly. The house was sold and the proceeds were divided.

In England, the administration of a parent’s estate went smoothly but in Austria, Jane Burgermeister could end being deprived of all her property and all her rights simply because she dared document hard evidence of wrong doing by the judge in charge.

The appointment of a court guardian is a move that involves such a drastic reduction of a person#s rights that according to the law, it can only be justifed as an „ultimate resort“ and is usually for the very elderly.

Once placed under court supervision, Jane Burgemreister will not be able to continue her work uncovering scandals as a journalist because a guardian has extensive power determine what a person can and cannot do.

Jane Burgrmeister has written for Nature, The Scientist, the British Medical Journal as well as the Guardian, the Observer, American Prospect and European Voice.

Her claims that the swine flu pandemic was hyped for profit have been reinforced by a report just issued by the Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly.

She, therefore, has a proven track record of accurate reporting.

There can be no question, therefore, of Jane Burgermeister being too confused to run her own life and represent herself in court.

The move to appointment a guardian is an unscrupulous bid to silence a journalist and a whistle blower.

This blatant abuse of office by a judge will fuel concerns that Austria has become a third world, banana Republic where there is no more rule of law left.

Government officials plunder citizens of their assets with impunity and then place them under court supervision whenever their victims start to take legal action in order for them to be able to continue their plunder.

A judge caught out in manipulating files to get more control of an estate can simply order the person who found the evidence to be placed in court guardianship, and deprived of all rights and all power to take any legal action.

It will take several days for the court in Döbling to do the paperwork following Lauer’s request. Jane Burgermeister will present the Döbling officials, among others, with documents, facts and records that strongly suggest that the appointment of a guardian for her is being blatantly and outragrously misused by Lauer to cover up evidence of a fraud.

If a judge is allowed to abuse their power so flagrantly in Austria and to force people to accept court supervision to stamp out evidence of their own crimes, no one in Austria is safe.

No one who goes into a hospital in old age is safe. And no one who makes a complaint about corrupt officials can be sure they will not be deprived of their property and basic rights by those same corrupt officials.

Whether in Canada or Austria, we see how the rule of law has been eroded.

The shocking scenes in Toronto show a police force on the rampage, grabbing citizens out of crowds, throwing them into unmarked cars and detaining them in conditions resembling Guantanamo Bay after secret powers were granted.

At the G20 summit in Canada, the world’s top Bilderberg government officials pledged to carry on their plundering of the populations of Europe and the USA by slashing national budgets to make bigger interest payments to banks for overvalued, paper property debt.

Jane Burgermeister’s father had a doctorate in economics and was able to explain the entire scam.

But not even he was prepared for the corruption in Austria and in Europe in 2010.

It is a scandal that a person who has documented hard evidence of wrong doing by a judge should be deprived by that same judge of their most basic rights and freedoms by misusing the guardianship.

In Nazi Germany, too, people could be deprived of all their rights, imprisoned and killed, by the whimsical orders of government officials.

Wake up, Europe! Wake up!”

Advertisements

July 1, 2010 - Posted by | Human rights

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: